Brutal, Just Brutal

January 28, 2012

Author: Barr Jozwicki - Categories: Market Update - Tags: Blood Money. Mitt's Blood Money., Medicare Fraud. Gingrich, Obama, Romney, Super PAC

Brutal, Just, Brutal

Gingrich Super Pac new 7 minute movie on

Romney and Medicare

Came out at 1:00AM EST

Click on word FRAUD above to see it

What’s even worse for Romney is Gingrich , catches Romney in a “blatant lie” in the Tampa debate about 6 Minutes and 30 seconds into the film.

Gingrich “Did Bain have any work with the government such as Medicare and Medicaid.” Romney “We didn’t do any work with the government.”

Documentation for Film at

“MittsBloodMoney.com“

That’s Gingrich’s Super Pac title NOT mine

Be Afraid, be very afraid because Super Pac adds by members of a corrupt oligarchy and permitted by the 5 right wing Supreme Court Justices who gutted campaign finance reform by voting to allow this are buying our democracy.

Free Ecommerce Software

you should not get any negative remarks under your site which will become a big hurdle to your business

George

JS, in the following response to you please replace the word "pschycopathic with sociopathic.(easy mistake to make)
thanks, George

George

Js you seem to have a difficult time making your point without being condescending or even a bit offensive in a back door kind of way. ( words like misguided and missinformed etc.) It seems a bit over defensive to me.
You say you read a lot of history. it shows. you put little value on character,morals and ethics. I would suggest that you read some books on psychology and philosophy. Would you say that Hitler might have had a few psychological issues? I know it's an extreem example but it makes the point. Watch Romney and Gengrich go at it now. They have crossed a line where they aren't showing who the other is as much as they are revealing who they themselves are. Their battle has become ego driven. Debates themselves are also ego driven. The goal is to win regardless of whether you are in reality right or wrong. It comes down to your ability to present something in the most convincing way. This is why so many court cases are won by the most expensive lawyer. The difference between a political conversation and a debate is that both sides contribute to a conversation and both sides come away with something from the other. They actually contemplate and respect what the other has to say. Once the ego is engaged, it's a debate. The last thing that comes out of that is anything but truth and there's a desperate need to win.
How far back do you read in history. Try the Roman empire. Romney has spent his life building an empire. Financially he has conquered all that intrests him. in my opinion, He sees the whitehouse as something he needs to conquer. A book on psychology would teach you how to read a person in a different way. Things like body language, shifting eyes, inability to look someone directly in the eye when he's lying. (where Newt on the other hand has perfected that one)., deflecting questions to other subjects, repeating questions to buy time to create lies when caught off guard. You would learn how to recognize personality disorders and character flaws. Things like Narcissism and projection. I believe Romney is a total narcissist bordering on psychopathic.
One problem with a narcissist is that he doesn't realize that that is what he is. He's incapable of recognizing it in himself. He is unable to look at personality and character flaws in himself, so he has to project his own flaws onto someone else. Romney does this with every question he has been asked. It's a way of raising himself up by lowering someone else. Romney uses every single question to lower Obama rather than just present himself on his record of accomplishments. I stated yesterday that whether jobs were created or destroyed by him, in truth they were nothing more than a by-product of a wealth driven ambition. They were never in any way the goal. This is not a record of job creation in any way. You skipped right over this in your assault on me. You just diverted to historical facts.
Psychopathic describes a person that can destroy without feelings or remorse. Sound familiar? J. Paul Getty once said " Base your success on the success of others" His explaination was that any level of sucess needs a foundation of success beneath it. Romney based his sucess on the success and "destruction and demise" of others. For every book that supports your views, there is another book just as credible that doesn't. Read "Behold A Pale Horse". It was written by a U.S. naval intelligence officer. A bomb was put in his car to prevent him from printing it. Fortunately it didn't kill him. Check out the connection between Bush sr. and Bilderberg.
You said I overlooked Romney's charitable contributions. What is your defination of charitable? How much of those contributions year after year were over and above what gave him a tax advantage. Thirty five years ago I belonged to the Mormon church. I don't consider tithing 10% of your income charitable because it's not done for charitable reasons. They're taught that if you give 10% of your income to god, it will be returned ten fold. Even that's about making money. The church doesn't even financially support the missionaries that deliver their message around the world. They're sponsered by their families. This is not charity. The teaching says give 10% of your income to God. I'm reasonably sure that if it were up to God, he would take that vast amount of money and devide it among the families whose lives he ruined in the name of creative destruction. That would have been truly charitable. The difference between information and knowledge is experience.
It's obvious that you have a lot of information.
I don't know you and I have no interest in slugging anything out with you. If you insist on continuing to be agressive, condescending, and back door style offensive.......
Then consider my vote to be the one that cancelled yours out come election day.
George

Paul R

How to fix Capitalism http://www.businessinsider.com...

Popeye

Great find Paul.

Why pressing for the last ten years of federal income taxes is to show how he and so many like him get to pay 13.9% income tax rates.

This is only one loophole that needs to get closed and if Democrats were smart they will introduce a bill this spring/summer.

This is the tip of the iceberg and just the first step.

Barr - The level of hatred among Gingrich and Romney camps is unbelievable. The dishonesty of these two candidates is like nothing I've ever seen.

Popeye

Paul R

Popeye, I heard Ed Koch on Bloomberg radio yesterday. He was talking about the famous "Flat Tax" every one seems to want. It's a flat tax on earned income. Dividend, interest and capitals gains would be exempt. This is a fair tax?

Ed's editorial: http://www.newsmax.com/Koch/Fl...

Paul R

One can only speculate:How much would an intelligent well educated
concerned citizen of the US have been willing to pay a president to
have avoided two senseless wars ,thousands of dead and maimed ,loss of world trust, .financial collapse ,fiscal bankruptcy and near depression .George W.Bush cost little yet was the most expensive president in American history. A premium for quality is always a bargain

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...

Perhaps we should pay politicians more, not less.

Paul R

The report that will blow Europe up as the fascists take over! Germany is on the rise again.

http://www.businessinsider.com...

Barr Jozwicki

Everyone.

Great debates, ideas, and links to interesting stories yesterday. Here's a very effective Romney add against Gingrich. NBC and news anchor Tom Brokaw have asked that it be taken down not because it is inacurate, but used without permission. http://www.politico.com/blogs/...
Also notice on the top right of this site is a paid political add for the anti Mitt "Blood Money"

My overriding point in these adds is, no matter what side you are on, it's the wealthy oligarchy/kleptocracy both hidden and transparent that is buying your vote and crushing your democracy.

I'm spending lots of today trying to finish the stock/economic forecast for 2012 which is cautiously bullish with reservations.

Barr

George

JS, as I said once before, your perspective is your reality and mine is mine. We're both entitled to them and to express them. I'm 62 and I remember a lot. I remember when a different kind of capitalism existed and it was good for everyone. Today I see it like sand in an hour-glass. all of the sand is almost in one side and if something doesn't turn it over.... everything as we know it stops or changes drastically.
Weather jobs were created or destroyed by Romney, it doesn't matter because they were all a by-product of a wealth driven ambition. No jobs were created as a result of that being the initial goal. if destroying them made him money, then he destroyed them, and if creating them made him money, then they were created. The goal was always the same.....
money for Mitt. I just can't see him as someone capable of caring about any of us, when he's ovviously never cared about anyone but himself so-far.
In my opinion ( which I'm entitled to) this is not a record of accomplishment. I see it more as a record of Narcissism. And if it is a record of accomplishment, then it's even more important to look at ethics and morals.
Maybe I look at different things than you do. That doesn't make me misguided. it makes me my own person with my own values.
I respect yours........ respect mine.
As an artist I learned a long time ago that I had to back up far enough from my art to find the best perspective. I also try to do that in life...... thus, my opinions.

JS

George,

I'm also an artist and am 70 yrs.old. I've also read a lot of history: The Lyndon Johnson Trilogy was eye opener; also Pulitizer Prize winning bio's of our forefathers. Our history is replete with capitalism run amok: from slavery to Andrew Carnage, John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Joseph Kennedy (JFK's father), and many others. I also remember the Savings Bank collapse. Power and greed has been dominant forces throughout the world. What made this collapse was not a "new" greed, it was the same old greed, but this time aided with technology. Not so long ago, money couldn't be transferred across borders, instantly withdrawn from large financial institutions, etc. (One of the main reasons of the financial collapse was this instant transfer of money, and all the financial new products (CDO's, etc.) that were only possible with computers and new technology.

Yes, we all are entitled to our opinions, but hopefully informed opinions. Greed, murder, sex slavery, are still going on in the whole world, including America. And we've not changed that much.

As for Romney, you overlooked his charitable contributions, his saving the Olympics, and you don't give him credit for his self made success in business, something Obama lacked.

As for ethics, John D. Rockefeller ruthlessly cornered the oil market, and railroads. Because of this, kerosene went from dollars a gallon to pennies a gallon, enabling the low classes to heat and light their homes. I don't think this was J.D. Rockefeller's main goal; his goal was power and money. Henry Ford, ruthless and bigoted automobile magnate, paid his workers more than he had to. This was not altruistic; His goal; to let his workers be able to buy his cars, and for him to make more profits. ( A happy work force kept unions at bay). Capitalism is not simply ethics, it's finding ways to make money, period. Maybe you admire Buffet and Gates. Have you heard of ''vaporware"? That's where Gates would hear about a new software product that would compete with his; tell prospective buyers to not buy that product, that he was coming out with a better product, forcing these small businesses to fail, but never coming out with the product he "promised", in other words going up in vapor. It's a cruel world out there.

JS

Paul R

Why the Obama recovery is more impressive than the Reagan recovery.

http://www.businessinsider.com...

Paul R

Ron Brown (HGSI) has a good weekend market report out. It is an excellent video, he shows you where the money is going:

http://www.highgrowthstock.com...

George

There are brilliant people on both sides of everything. There are also brilliant people in the middle as well. Keep in mind that balance is usually found closer to the middle of all things.
What matters is the character, ethics, and morals behind the brilliance.
Are people wrong for wanting to reveal what they see. Especially if they believe it's for the greater good.
Even in therapy, it's difficult to better one's situation until they've identified the problem first. This often takes difficult and painfully honest conversation.

JS

George,
Actually you're misguided: character, ethics, and morals are subject to one's political leanings. Obama harped about money in politics, then rejected
campaign limits unlike McCain. Then he took vast amounts of money from Wall Street, the same group that brought our economy down. Then appointed many who had ties to Wall Street, and tax evaders (Geithner). Then approved 100cents on the dollar in payouts to Goldman Sachs. The list goes on and on. Billions will never be recovered from GM aid; trillions added to the national debt. And this payroll tax holiday, where is this money coming from? Why it's being BORROWED.

If you think that character issues are the best way to look at the race instead of a record of accomplishment, the history of our Presidents disproves that. Clinton's character is a case in point. Did his character prevent him from being a good Pres? You may be too young to know the "character" of Lyndon Johnson, but he was very effective: War on poverty, race relations. Vietnam, a war he didn't start (Kennedy) was his downfall. How about Carter; good character but one of our worst presidents in my lifetime.

JS

Paul R

John,

>Actually you're misguided:

Can you ever make a post without your usual slug at the person to whom you are speaking?

JS

Paul,

Evidently you don't read my comments, for if you did, you would see that it's rare when I make "slugs".
You and I have a "history". When my comment is made to you, then I'd expect a retort. Since it's not made to you, and I'm sure George can handle himself, why are you interposing yourself into this? Are you "Miss Manners" here? To keep us from conflict, please limit you comments to me when I comment to you.
JS

Paul R

Most everyone here civil to each other, why must you always try to insult the person to who you are replying?

Paul R

I met an interesting fellow at the last HGSI workshop I attended in California. His name is Stephen Gerritz and he is a professional money manager. He prepared an interesting PDF explaining how we use HGSI and Edgerater to analyze the market. Enjoy!

http://www.gerritzwealthmanage...

JS

Today's political posts are like a coffee klatch where a bunch of divorced women are ranting about what their ex's are doing and serving up all the "dirt" on their ex's new girlfriends or wives. Common, "women", get on with your lives: come up with ways to better your situation; bitching does nothing except make you think you're doing something. These conversations mean nothing till the actual Pres campaign. Then we'll see dirt fly all over the place. Whomever can influence "the great unwashed" will win. Till then, it's all BS.

JS

Popeye

JS - You're post is just Laugh out Loud funny. If it doesn't matter why make a post. Why insult George?

Did the Clinton-Obama primary matter? We should all compare it with the Romney-Gingrich primary.Romney has put ten times the resources Gingrich has into Florida. He should be wiping the floor with a horribly flawed candidate like Gingrich.But as Newt strips away the Romney image machine we are seeing an elitist, (who among us has Swiss bank accounts) who does not relate to common people, a fabricator, a weathy man who has a 13.9% federal income tax unlike the rest of us, a man flip flops constantly, and now a man who lies and was up to his eyballs in Medicare fraud.Truth is the Republican establishment is terrified of Gingrich. Romney's poularity dropped 16% in a week, but as you say that doesn't matter. Popeye

JS

Popeye,
Actually I do believe this doesn't matter now. In the Pres. race, it'll start mattering. Till then, it's just partisan BS. Anyway, since you'd never vote for a Rep. in this race, why bother? I can see Barr, who's working for Warren, if he blogged against Brown, that would be something worthwhile.
Till then, it's just the "coffee klatch". After the Reps. pick a candidate, we'll start seeing real "dirt", especially on Obama.
Most people just don't care right now. (the great unwashed). The political junkies, and 24/7 cable, are the only ones that care now.

JS

George

even for those who think that Obama is in some way evil.......
at least you can call it a" known evil "......... Romney and Newt are " unknown evils". No-one knows the potential of it.
A smart criminal is far more dangerous than a dumb one.

Paul R

EDITED

Robert H

Cannabals That's the best word I use describe Republicans. Like CDB said with "hate" When they can't eat terrorist, they eat democrats, then the eat their fellow Americans. When none of that is around they eat each other.
Robert H

Popeye

Let's all chip in and buy every Romney and Gingrich supporter 2 by 4s. Then put them in large rooms. Those that come out bloodied but still alive, we deny health insurance.

Popeye

Ewanapat

Popeye - Admit it. For all those times you've dumped on Obama, he's looking a whole lot better now.

EW

Popeye

EW - When you're right , you're right. These two right wing "cannibals" or "haters" deserve the Republican party and each other.

When you compare them to Obama its like the difference between a pig sty and a flower.

However what Obama had done wrong - lie denying habeas corpus to Americans is still wrong.

Popeye

CDB

The entire Republican Party is one giant mean spirited, negative, disfunctional, and loathsome party that's full of hate. Not just hate for terrorist, but hate for democrats, hate for their fellow Americans and hate for each other.

Gingrch and Romney personify this.CBD

Paul R

I just keep asking "is this all they have?"

CDB

Paul - 19 disgustingly negative debates that culminate in "Mitt's Blood Money." Are they so wrapped up in hate that they do not understand what they are doing to their party and America?

Paul R

One would think the great Republican party would soon realize debates aren't in their best interest!

Paul R

Key Report for Home Builders ETF

http://www.thestreet.com/story...

Check the video in the report!

Fact or Fiction?

Now before any of you suggest I should have considered this sort of information before adding several home builders to Your Stock List, keep in mind I read the charts, watch the Industry Groups etc and trade accordingly.

Six weeks ago or so I gave a list of home builders to check out. Several had nice charts and a very nice price climb since that post. Did any of you profit from that post? URI was on that list and you would have made a bundle!

http://www.investors411.com/th...

Back in October in the comments section I made a post listing home building stocks that were found in my favorite High Demand Search. I wish I had paid attention to that signal HGSI handed out!

RYL posted earnings Friday and it's share price dropped like a rock at the open to 16.96 and almost immediately climbed to 19 and closed for the day at 18.41. I didn't listen to the conference call but investors must have liked what they heard.

Several other builders (LEN, DHI) have reported good earnings, beat estimates etc. So do we ignore the charts or trade on one of Cramer's videos? That video almost makes you scared to never buy a home builder again. Is the economy that bad? I donno, manufacturing factories are opening nicely in my area, they are hiring again.

Oh, the semis are moving, I asked the other day for some suggestions for addition to Your Stock List. I don't want to plead again for suggestions like we did with the home builders, it is Your Stock List.

http://www.investors411.com/tr...

Have a great weekend folks, my grand children are here so time will be spent with them!

Paul R

Here is the High Demand search for Friday Jan 27,look at the industry groups of the top stocks,some great charts there!

http://people.delphiforums.com...

A few nice semi's are on that list. Happy hunting!

Paul R

Ok before I stop and feed the grand kids breakfast here is another HGSI scan for the top 25 high demand growth stocks from Jan 27, Note the industries. Some very nice charts!

http://people.delphiforums.com...

These were the high quality movers Friday, gee whiz do I see AKRX on the list?

Paul R

Last week back I posted the Chemical Stocks surfaced in the High Demand Scan, did any of you make some money on this group? Take a look at the charts now!

Specialty Chemicals (7.00%, 7 securities)

    Albemarle Corp. (ALB)
    Ecolab Inc. (ECL)
    Lyondellbasell Industries Nv (LYB)
    Rockwood Holdings (ROC)
    Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
    Valspar Corp. (VAL)
    W.R. Grace & Company (GRA)

Diversified Chemicals (6.00%, 6 securities)

    DOW Chemical Company (DOW)
    E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company (DD)
    Eastman Chemical Company (EMN)
    Fmc Corp. (FMC)
    Huntsman Corp. (HUN)
    Ppg Industries (PPG)

Commodity Chemicals (4.00%, 4 securities)

    Celanese Corp. (CE)
    Georgia Gulf Corp. (GGC)
    Methanex Corp. (MEOH)
    Westlake Chemical Corp. (WLK)

Above stocks selected 01/18 by HGSI software.

Paul R

Industry Group chart Jan 27 close, top dollar volume, i.e. where the money went!

http://people.delphiforums.com...

Ewanapat

"Mitt's Blood Money" is a slick and slimy presentation that would scare the pants off any senior on medicare. Can you trust the guy, especially when he they have caught him in such an obvious lie.

EW

Investors 411 Blog

Brutal, Just Brutal

Discussion

Archives

Financial Charts

Blog Roll

Translator

Blog Vitals

February 2012
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
« Jan
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29