<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Market Update &#8211; Deja Vu all over again.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.Investors411.com/market-update-deja-vu-all-over-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.Investors411.com/market-update-deja-vu-all-over-again/</link>
	<description>by Barr Jozwicki</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:31:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sherwehe</title>
		<link>http://www.Investors411.com/market-update-deja-vu-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>sherwehe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.Investors411.com/?p=2234#comment-618</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100% D. The Nobel Peace Prize Economist Joseph Stiglitz dedicated an entire book to the cost of the Iraq war called the &quot;Three Trillion Dollar War.&quot; In a recent interview Stiglitz stated that the estimates ranged from a low end extrapolation of just under three trillion dollars and as high as ten trillion depending how long the war lasts and the nature of the conflict. As Barr says, keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of extremist terrorist hands and unstable govts. such as Pakistans is paramount. The question is how to do that . We do know that our military presence in both Iraq and Afghanistan is exponentially increasing terrorists and terrorism but this is no surprise to our elected leaders because before we set foot in Afghanistan and Iraq our intelligence reports stated very explicitly that a military strike in this region will in fact increase terrorism which we now know has. It&#039;s interesting that It&#039;s called a war on terrorism when we knew before the war started that we would just manufacture more terrorists and terrorism so one can only rationally conclude that this war was never about terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100% D. The Nobel Peace Prize Economist Joseph Stiglitz dedicated an entire book to the cost of the Iraq war called the &#8220;Three Trillion Dollar War.&#8221; In a recent interview Stiglitz stated that the estimates ranged from a low end extrapolation of just under three trillion dollars and as high as ten trillion depending how long the war lasts and the nature of the conflict. As Barr says, keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of extremist terrorist hands and unstable govts. such as Pakistans is paramount. The question is how to do that . We do know that our military presence in both Iraq and Afghanistan is exponentially increasing terrorists and terrorism but this is no surprise to our elected leaders because before we set foot in Afghanistan and Iraq our intelligence reports stated very explicitly that a military strike in this region will in fact increase terrorism which we now know has. It&#39;s interesting that It&#39;s called a war on terrorism when we knew before the war started that we would just manufacture more terrorists and terrorism so one can only rationally conclude that this war was never about terrorism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.</title>
		<link>http://www.Investors411.com/market-update-deja-vu-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.Investors411.com/?p=2234#comment-617</guid>
		<description>What if all the trillions of dollars used to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq went instead to building infrastructure. I read that Afghanistan has a GDP of 22 billion and we are spending 65 billion now to keep our army there. - The world makes no sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if all the trillions of dollars used to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq went instead to building infrastructure. I read that Afghanistan has a GDP of 22 billion and we are spending 65 billion now to keep our army there. &#8211; The world makes no sense.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherwehe</title>
		<link>http://www.Investors411.com/market-update-deja-vu-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>sherwehe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.Investors411.com/?p=2234#comment-389</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100% D. The Nobel Peace Prize Economist Joseph Stiglitz dedicated an entire book to the cost of the Iraq war called the &quot;Three Trillion Dollar War.&quot; In a recent interview Stiglitz stated that the estimates ranged from a low end extrapolation of just under three trillion dollars and as high as ten trillion depending how long the war lasts and the nature of the conflict. As Barr says, keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of extremist terrorist hands and unstable govts. such as Pakistans. The question is how to do that . We do know that our military presence in both Iraq and Afghanistan is exponentially increasing terrorists and terrorism but this is no surprise to our elected leaders because before we set foot in Afghanistan and Iraq our intelligence reports stated very explicitly that a military strike in this region will in fact increase terrorism which we now know has. It&#039;s interesting that It&#039;s called a war on terrorism when we knew before the war started that we would just manufacture more terrorist and terrorism so one can only rationally conclude that this war was never about terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100% D. The Nobel Peace Prize Economist Joseph Stiglitz dedicated an entire book to the cost of the Iraq war called the &#8220;Three Trillion Dollar War.&#8221; In a recent interview Stiglitz stated that the estimates ranged from a low end extrapolation of just under three trillion dollars and as high as ten trillion depending how long the war lasts and the nature of the conflict. As Barr says, keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of extremist terrorist hands and unstable govts. such as Pakistans. The question is how to do that . We do know that our military presence in both Iraq and Afghanistan is exponentially increasing terrorists and terrorism but this is no surprise to our elected leaders because before we set foot in Afghanistan and Iraq our intelligence reports stated very explicitly that a military strike in this region will in fact increase terrorism which we now know has. It&#39;s interesting that It&#39;s called a war on terrorism when we knew before the war started that we would just manufacture more terrorist and terrorism so one can only rationally conclude that this war was never about terrorism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.</title>
		<link>http://www.Investors411.com/market-update-deja-vu-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.Investors411.com/?p=2234#comment-388</guid>
		<description>What if all the trillions of dollars used to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq went instead to building infrastructure. I read that Afghanistan has a GDP of 22 billion and we are spending 65 billion now to keep our army there. - The world makes no sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if all the trillions of dollars used to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq went instead to building infrastructure. I read that Afghanistan has a GDP of 22 billion and we are spending 65 billion now to keep our army there. &#8211; The world makes no sense.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
